<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>PhD Theses from the Department of European Languages</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/2160/4608" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/2160/4608</id>
<updated>2013-06-19T00:26:47Z</updated>
<dc:date>2013-06-19T00:26:47Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Aspects of sociophonetic variability in French consonants</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/2160/4609" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Temple, Rosalind A. M.</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/2160/4609</id>
<updated>2012-01-09T09:36:14Z</updated>
<published>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Aspects of sociophonetic variability in French consonants
Temple, Rosalind A. M.
This thesis is an exploration of contrasts and inter-relationships between theoretical&#13;
phonology and experimental phonetics on the one hand, and variationist approaches to the&#13;
analysis of language on the other, with particular reference to the voicing contrast in French&#13;
obstruents. Chapter 1 introduces the study. Chapter 2 examines the modelling of variation at&#13;
different phonological and phonetic levels and considers the merits and shortcomings of these.&#13;
Chapter 3 examines the reverse of that coin, that is the way variationists approach the&#13;
phonetics of variation. Chapter 4 explores aspects of the general phonology and phonetics of&#13;
the voicing contrast and the various factors which may contribute to variation in its&#13;
realisation, while Chapter 5 presents a brief survey of the background to the contrast in French&#13;
with particular reference to historical and more recent evidence for variability. In Chapter 6, I consider methodological contrasts between the two paradigms and present the methodological&#13;
background to the empirical studies reported in later Chapters. Chapter 7 consists of a study of&#13;
stop data from the Atlas linguistique de la France, while Chapters 8 and 9 analyse a&#13;
contemporary corpus in order to find evidence of the different sorts of constraints that could&#13;
govern variability in the production of voicing. I conclude in the brief 10th chapter that the&#13;
only satisfactory approaches to studying the coarse- and fine-grained phonetic variability&#13;
which is characteristic of real speech, is to combine complementary approaches from the two&#13;
paradigms.
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
