<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2160/4608">
<title>PhD Theses from the Department of European Languages</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2160/4608</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2160/4609"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2013-06-19T04:43:38Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2160/4609">
<title>Aspects of sociophonetic variability in French consonants</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2160/4609</link>
<description>Aspects of sociophonetic variability in French consonants
Temple, Rosalind A. M.
This thesis is an exploration of contrasts and inter-relationships between theoretical&#13;
phonology and experimental phonetics on the one hand, and variationist approaches to the&#13;
analysis of language on the other, with particular reference to the voicing contrast in French&#13;
obstruents. Chapter 1 introduces the study. Chapter 2 examines the modelling of variation at&#13;
different phonological and phonetic levels and considers the merits and shortcomings of these.&#13;
Chapter 3 examines the reverse of that coin, that is the way variationists approach the&#13;
phonetics of variation. Chapter 4 explores aspects of the general phonology and phonetics of&#13;
the voicing contrast and the various factors which may contribute to variation in its&#13;
realisation, while Chapter 5 presents a brief survey of the background to the contrast in French&#13;
with particular reference to historical and more recent evidence for variability. In Chapter 6, I consider methodological contrasts between the two paradigms and present the methodological&#13;
background to the empirical studies reported in later Chapters. Chapter 7 consists of a study of&#13;
stop data from the Atlas linguistique de la France, while Chapters 8 and 9 analyse a&#13;
contemporary corpus in order to find evidence of the different sorts of constraints that could&#13;
govern variability in the production of voicing. I conclude in the brief 10th chapter that the&#13;
only satisfactory approaches to studying the coarse- and fine-grained phonetic variability&#13;
which is characteristic of real speech, is to combine complementary approaches from the two&#13;
paradigms.
</description>
<dc:date>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
