<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2160/5706">
<title>Public Law</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2160/5706</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2160/14053"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2160/13938"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2160/13856"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2160/13852"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2013-05-19T02:17:13Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2160/14053">
<title>The Oxford Australian Legal Dictionary</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2160/14053</link>
<description>The Oxford Australian Legal Dictionary
Cox, Noel
entries on intellectual property law
</description>
<dc:date>2008-12-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2160/13938">
<title>The Survival of Notaries Public in New Zealand: Orphaned offspring of a venerable parent</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2160/13938</link>
<description>The Survival of Notaries Public in New Zealand: Orphaned offspring of a venerable parent
Cox, Noel
Almost twenty years ago the Imperial Laws Application Act 1988 (NZ) ended the application in New Zealand of most hitherto surviving imperial legislation. This was regarded at the time as being one of the principal steps on the road to legal independence. Despite the passage of this legislation, notaries public in New Zealand are still appointed in the name of the Archbishop of Canterbury. Consideration was given at the time of enacting the Imperial Laws Application Act 1988 (NZ) to introducing a Notaries Public Bill, in order to make provision for notaries public. In the event nothing was done, and the office remains unreformed. The result of the passage of the Imperial Laws Application Act 1988 (NZ), and of more recent legislative and regulatory changes in England and Wales, is that the legal basis for the appointment in New Zealand is now unclear, but possibly dependent upon principles of usage and custom, rather than statutory authority as hitherto. Yet the appointment remains sought after, with over 200 in practice today.
</description>
<dc:date>2008-08-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2160/13856">
<title>The Crown Down Under: Issues and Trends in Australia and New Zealand</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2160/13856</link>
<description>The Crown Down Under: Issues and Trends in Australia and New Zealand
Cox, Noel
Any appraisal of the position of the monarchy in New Zealand inevitably invites comparisons with Australia, and to a lesser extent Canada and the United Kingdom. We share many common attributes, though it is important to be mindful of the differences. I will begin by highlighting some of the differences and similarities between Australia and New Zealand.
Cox, N. (2012). The Crown Down Under: Issues and Trends in Australia and New Zealand. In: The evolving Canadian crown. (pp. 193-202). Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, School of Policy Studies, Queen's University, Smith, J., &amp; Jackson, D. M. (Eds.) Based on papers presented at the conference: The Crown in Canada : Present Realities and Future Options, held in Ottawa, Ont., from June 9-10, 2010 chapter: 12
</description>
<dc:date>2010-06-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2160/13852">
<title>The ethical and moral obligations on the legal profession and their grounding in biblical principles and injunctions</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2160/13852</link>
<description>The ethical and moral obligations on the legal profession and their grounding in biblical principles and injunctions
Cox, Noel
Cox, N. (2009). The ethical and moral obligations on the legal profession and their grounding in biblical principles and injunctions. Auckland Christian Lawyers Annual Dinner, Auckland, New Zealand, 26 November 2009
</description>
<dc:date>2009-11-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
