Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jones, Martin Russell
dc.contributor.author MacLeod, Gordon
dc.date.accessioned 2008-12-15T14:36:09Z
dc.date.available 2008-12-15T14:36:09Z
dc.date.issued 2004-12
dc.identifier.citation Jones , M R & MacLeod , G 2004 , ' Regional spaces, spaces of regionalism: territory, insurgent politics and the English question ' Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers , vol 29 , no. 4 , pp. 433-452 . , 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00140.x en
dc.identifier.issn 1475-5661
dc.identifier.other PURE: 95537
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/1628
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2160/1628
dc.description Jones, M., MacLeod, G. (2004). Regional spaces, spaces of regionalism: territory, insurgent politics and the English question. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29 (4), 433-452. en
dc.description.abstract Amid the globalization of economic life and a myriad of powerful challenges to Westphalian traditions of political statehood, it is now routinely contended that regions are ‘in resurgence’. Nonetheless, much of the debate on this purported regional renaissance is bedevilled by confusion over what scholars and activists mean by regions and an analogous mystification as to why some regions are ‘successful’, ‘lagging’ or ‘different’. Our paper aims to instil some coherence to this debate by distinguishing between what we term regional spaces and spaces of regionalism. It then draws on this distinction to explore the institutionalization of England's South West region, highlighting some tensions which prevail over its economic future, its political representation, its territorial shape and cultural vernacular. In undertaking this, we demonstrate how the formation of any given regional map is reflective – and indeed constitutive – of an unevenly developing, often overlapping and superimposing mosaic of economic practices, political mobilizations, cultural performances and institutional accomplishments. This prompts us to question the currently fashionable inclination to fully jettison a scalar and/or territorial approach to the theory and practice of spatiality in favour of relational/topological/non-territorial approaches. en
dc.format.extent 20 en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers en
dc.title Regional spaces, spaces of regionalism: territory, insurgent politics and the English question en
dc.type Text en
dc.type.publicationtype Article (Journal) en
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00140.x
dc.contributor.institution Registry en
dc.contributor.institution Institute of Geography & Earth Sciences en
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair


Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics