Show simple item record McInnes, Colin 2009-01-08T16:16:51Z 2009-01-08T16:16:51Z 2009-02-11
dc.identifier.citation McInnes , C 2009 , ' HIV, AIDS and Conflict in Africa ' Paper presented at 2009 International Studies Association Annual Convention , New York , United States of America , 01/02/2009 - 28/02/2009 , . en
dc.identifier.citation conference en
dc.identifier.other PURE: 98078
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: 54bb41dd-1ad3-48d3-9e99-bbf466f48bdb
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/1818
dc.identifier.other DSpace_20121128.csv: row: 1490
dc.identifier.other RAD: 9634
dc.identifier.other RAD_Outputs_All_ID_Import_20121105.csv: row: 3031
dc.identifier.uri en
dc.description McInnes, Colin, 'HIV, AIDS and Conflict in Africa: Why Isn’t It (Even) Worse?', Paper for annual conference of the International Studies Association, New York NY, February 2009. en
dc.description.abstract The argument that there is a link between conflict and the spread of HIV has become commonplace in both the academic and policy world. This is particularly so for sub-Saharan Africa given the combination of an HIV pandemic in the region and high levels of violent conflict and state instability. However the link is not straightforward. Crucially, despite significant risk factors indicating a relationship between conflict and the spread of HIV, empirical evidence exists that HIV does not always increase in times of conflict, and that in some conflicts prevalence has decreased. This suggests a more complex relationship than originally envisaged. This paper does four things. First, it examines the risk factors identified in the early years of this decade which indicated a relationship between conflict and the spread of HIV. Second, it discusses how empirical evidence began to emerge suggesting a more complex relationship and how a number of conflicts demonstrated reduced HIV prevalence despite these risk factors. The third section moves beyond risk factors to suggest a framework based on susceptibility and vulnerability which explains under what circumstances HIV might - and might not - be spread, despite the presence of risk factors. The final section examines four cases - Sierra Leone, Angola, Rwanda and the DRC - where conflict did not lead to a significant increase in the prevalence of HIV, using the previous framework as the basis to explain this phenomenon. The paper concludes that, despite the fears of a few years ago, conflict does not readily act as a vector for HIV, though the potential for this to occur does still exist under certain circumstances. en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.rights en
dc.title HIV, AIDS and Conflict in Africa en
dc.type /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontoconference/paper en
dc.contributor.institution Department of International Politics en
dc.description.status Non peer reviewed en

Files in this item

Aside from theses and in the absence of a specific licence document on an item page, all works in Cadair are accessible under the CC BY-NC-ND Licence. AU theses and dissertations held on Cadair are made available for the purposes of private study and non-commercial research and brief extracts may be reproduced under fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review. If you have any queries in relation to the re-use of material on Cadair, contact

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair

Advanced Search