Show simple item record Jackson, Richard Dean Wells 2009-04-15T11:05:37Z 2009-04-15T11:05:37Z 2007
dc.identifier.citation Jackson , R D W 2007 , ' The Case for a Critical Terrorism Studies ' . en
dc.identifier.other PURE: 99752
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: b6217630-5b16-4783-b731-53091fa0d9e1
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/1945
dc.identifier.other DSpace_20121128.csv: row: 1571
dc.identifier.uri en
dc.description Jackson, Richard, Gunning, Jeroen, Breen Smyth, Marie, 'The Case for a Critical Terrorism Studies', Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30 – September 2, 2007 en
dc.description.abstract This paper was written in response to three recent developments in the field of terrorism studies. First, since 2001 there has been a tremendous growth in terrorism-related research and teaching activities. Following the attacks in America, terrorism studies rapidly expanded from a relatively minor sub-field of security studies to a large stand alone field with its own dedicated journals, research centres, leading scholars and experts, research funding opportunities, conferences, seminars and study programmes. As a consequence, it is now one of the fastest expanding areas of research in the English-speaking academic world, with literally thousands of new books and articles published over the past few years, significant investment in terrorism-related research projects and increasing numbers of postgraduate dissertations and undergraduate students. Such phenomenal growth calls for critical reflection on the state and direction of terrorism research. Second, there has already been a growing dissatisfaction with the quality of the voluminous output of the field. As detailed below, a number of authoritative scholarly reviews have maintained that much of the new research – and much of the early research on political terrorism – fails to meet rigorous standards of scholarship. Related to this, it is also possible to discern a growing and deep-seated sense of unease about the progress and consequences of the global war on terror (WOT). In late 2006, for example, the Iraq Study Group noted that, 'Many Americans are dissatisfied, not just with the situation in Iraq but with the state of our political debate regarding Iraq… Our country deserves a debate that prizes substance over rhetoric.‟ In other words, in a political environment characterised by decreasing public and academic confidence in official approaches to counter-terrorism, we argue that it is intellectually and politically timely to consider how a new, more critical approach might offer an alternative paradigm for considering political terror. en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.rights en
dc.title The Case for a Critical Terrorism Studies en
dc.type /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontoconference/paper en
dc.contributor.institution Department of International Politics en
dc.description.status Non peer reviewed en

Files in this item

Aside from theses and in the absence of a specific licence document on an item page, all works in Cadair are accessible under the CC BY-NC-ND Licence. AU theses and dissertations held on Cadair are made available for the purposes of private study and non-commercial research and brief extracts may be reproduced under fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review. If you have any queries in relation to the re-use of material on Cadair, contact

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair

Advanced Search