Show simple item record Jackson, Richard Dean Wells 2009-04-15T13:55:18Z 2009-04-15T13:55:18Z 2007
dc.identifier.citation Jackson , R D W 2007 , ' Terrorism Studies and the Politics of State Power ' . en
dc.identifier.other PURE: 99862
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: 6668488b-4277-42dc-99e8-07815b017c13
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/1951
dc.identifier.other DSpace_20121128.csv: row: 1577
dc.identifier.uri en
dc.description Jackson, Richard, 'Terrorism Studies and the Politics of State Power', International Studies Association (ISA) 47th Annual Convention, 28 Feb. – 3 March, 2007, Chicago, United States. This paper is a work in progress for a symposium on 'Making the Case for a Critical Terrorism Studies' for the journal European Political Science. en
dc.description.abstract An analysis of the terrorism studies field reveals a number of methodological, theoretical and ethical-normative problems. One of its more serious problems is its tendency to uncritically reproduce a number of highly questionable narratives and assumptions about terrorism as a phenomenon and counterterrorism as state response. For example, a great deal of past and recently published terrorism research unreflectively assumes that: non-state terrorism poses an existential threat to modern societies; there is a 'new terrorism' that is religiously motivated, willing to employ weapons of mass destruction, and aimed primarily at causing mass casualties; the roots of terrorism lie in individual psychological abnormality and religious extremism; and coercive-based counterterrorism is an effective response to non-state terrorism. This paper argues that these misconceptions are not simply errors based on poor research. Rather, these broadly accepted understandings – this terrorism 'knowledge' – also work politically to reify and reproduce state power. In particular, this 'scientifically' generated terrorism 'knowledge' frequently functions to, among others: de-legitimise resistance by non-state actors; justify domestic political projects unconnected to terrorism, such as social surveillance; bolster the power and priorities of the agencies of state security; benefit powerful economic actors linked to the security sector, such as private security firms, defence industries, and pharmaceutical companies; control wider social and political dissent and set the parameters for acceptable political debate; and provide intellectual justification for foreign imperial projects. However, academic research is never without political and normative consequence; knowledge is always for somebody and for something. This paper argues that given the current situation in the field, there is an urgent need for an explicitly 'critical' terrorism studies. en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.rights en
dc.title Terrorism Studies and the Politics of State Power en
dc.type /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontoconference/paper en
dc.contributor.institution Department of International Politics en
dc.description.status Non peer reviewed en

Files in this item

Aside from theses and in the absence of a specific licence document on an item page, all works in Cadair are accessible under the CC BY-NC-ND Licence. AU theses and dissertations held on Cadair are made available for the purposes of private study and non-commercial research and brief extracts may be reproduced under fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review. If you have any queries in relation to the re-use of material on Cadair, contact

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair

Advanced Search