Show simple item record Wheeler, Nicholas 2009-04-24T12:00:10Z 2009-04-24T12:00:10Z 2007
dc.identifier.citation Wheeler , N 2007 , ' The Security Council's Crisis of Legitimacy and the Use of Force ' International Politics , vol 44 , pp. 214–231 . DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800185 en
dc.identifier.issn 1740-3898
dc.identifier.other PURE: 100155
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: f31acb8e-2d07-4c56-a8b1-39cda2741b07
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/1970
dc.identifier.other DSpace_20121128.csv: row: 1594
dc.identifier.other Scopus: 33847147088
dc.identifier.uri en
dc.description Wheeler, Nicholas, Morris, Justin, 'The Security Council's Crisis of Legitimacy and the Use of Force', in Ian Clark and Christian Reus-Smit (eds) Resolving International Crises of Legitimacy, International Politics (2007) 44, 214–231 Keywords: legitimacy, use of force, Security Council, collective security, great powers en
dc.description.abstract The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is at the heart of the world's collective security system. It is upon this body that rests 'primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security' (UN Charter, Article 24). In this article, we examine the current debate regarding the legitimacy crisis facing the UNSC. We consider its most usual manifestation, namely that the Council faces a crisis of legitimacy because of its inability to constrain the unilaterally inclined hegemonic United States. But we also examine the converse argument that it is the whole UN collective security mechanism (rather than just the Council) that is in crisis. According to this, it is the failure to recognize the unique dangers immanent within the contemporary security environment and the inability of the UN security system to tackle these which is the cause of the current crisis of legitimacy. International society, this position continues, must acknowledge these, and vest in the hegemon the powers it requires in order to meet its global responsibilities. Acknowledging the implications of both of these positions, we argue that the resolution of the current crisis of legitimacy is to be achieved through a more expansive interpretation of the Security Council's extant powers, accompanied by a commitment on the part of the United States to reinvest in the multilateral machinery upon which global order is founded. en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof International Politics en
dc.rights en
dc.title The Security Council's Crisis of Legitimacy and the Use of Force en
dc.type /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article en
dc.contributor.institution Department of International Politics en
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en

Files in this item

Aside from theses and in the absence of a specific licence document on an item page, all works in Cadair are accessible under the CC BY-NC-ND Licence. AU theses and dissertations held on Cadair are made available for the purposes of private study and non-commercial research and brief extracts may be reproduced under fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review. If you have any queries in relation to the re-use of material on Cadair, contact

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair

Advanced Search