Show simple item record Barker, Martin 2009-05-06T13:06:16Z 2009-05-06T13:06:16Z 2002
dc.identifier.citation Barker , M 2002 , ' Crashing Out ' Screen , vol 43 , no. 1 , pp. 74-8 . DOI: 10.1093/screen/43.1.74 en
dc.identifier.issn 1460-2474
dc.identifier.other PURE: 100376
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: 4e53f143-ccc0-4fa4-8c12-487f42720a83
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/1990
dc.identifier.other DSpace_20121128.csv: row: 1605
dc.identifier.other Scopus: 63849144772
dc.identifier.uri en
dc.description Barker, Martin, (2002) 'Crashing out’, Screen, 43 (1), pp. 74-8. en
dc.description.abstract It is now four years since the considerable crisis that pervaded British cinema politics finally juddered to a halt as David Cronenberg's Crash (1996) was released at last to the screens, uncut as an '18'. The controversy lasted exactly a year. In June 1996, Alexander Walker published his condemnation of the film in the London Evening Standard. Following a longish pause, the Daily Mail – from the same publishing stable – took up the cause, albeit much more crudely, and mounted a steadily intensifying campaign to block the film's release. Repeated front-page banner headlines combined with attempts to use MPs and other political figures as opinion conduits, approaches to every local authority in the country seeking action against the film, led on to journalists door-stepping individual examiners from the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC). Although in the end their campaign failed, the toxins they implanted were mightily effective. Crash did very badly when released. In many places, multiplexes booked the film, probably hoping that the controversy would have stimulated a perverse wish to see it. When the opposite happened, the Mail claimed a kind of victory. The British public, about whose vulnerability they had been panicking for a year, suddenly proved to have the 'commonsense' necessary to reject the film. en
dc.format.extent 5 en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Screen en
dc.rights en
dc.title Crashing Out en
dc.type /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article en
dc.contributor.institution Department of Theatre, Film and Television Studies en
dc.contributor.institution Film and Television Research en
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en

Files in this item

Aside from theses and in the absence of a specific licence document on an item page, all works in Cadair are accessible under the CC BY-NC-ND Licence. AU theses and dissertations held on Cadair are made available for the purposes of private study and non-commercial research and brief extracts may be reproduced under fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review. If you have any queries in relation to the re-use of material on Cadair, contact

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair

Advanced Search