Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Salisbury, J. G.
dc.contributor.author Dovers, S.
dc.contributor.author Lindenmayer, D. B.
dc.contributor.author Fazey, Ioan
dc.contributor.author Fazey, John A.
dc.date.accessioned 2009-07-15T15:55:25Z
dc.date.available 2009-07-15T15:55:25Z
dc.date.issued 2006-05-26
dc.identifier.citation Salisbury , J G , Dovers , S , Lindenmayer , D B , Fazey , I & Fazey , J A 2006 , ' The nature and role of experiential knowledge for environmental conservation ' Environmental Conservation , vol 33 , no. 1 , pp. 1-10 . , 10.1017/S037689290600275X en
dc.identifier.issn 1469-4387
dc.identifier.other PURE: 112153
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/2670
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2160/2670
dc.description Fazey, I., Fazey, J. A., Salisbury, J. G., Lindenmayer, D. B., Dovers, S. (2006). The nature and role of experiential knowledge for environmental conservation. Environmental Conservation, 33, (1), 1-10. Sponsorship: Endowment for Excellence Scholarship from The Australian National University. en
dc.description.abstract Understanding the nature and role of experiential knowledge for environmental conservation is a necessary step towards understanding if it should be used and how it might be applied with other types of knowledge in an evidence-based approach. This paper describes the nature of experiential and expert knowledge. It then discusses the role of experiential knowledge as a complement to scientific knowledge and explains the interplay between experiential knowledge with conservation research and practice using a simple conceptual model of how individuals learn. There are five main conclusions: (1) because experiential knowledge will always play a role in decision-making, enhancing ability to learn from experiences (including research) will have a significant influence on the effectiveness of conservation outcomes; (2) while experiential knowledge is qualitatively very different from quantitative information, both are important and complementary; (3) some experiential knowledge can be expressed quantitatively, but experiential knowledge can be difficult to isolate as single facts or propositions and qualitative methods will therefore often be required to elicit experiential knowledge; (4) because each person's expertise is unique, when using experiential knowledge the extent of a person's experience and its relevance to a particular problem need to be specified; and (5) as with any form of knowledge, there are limitations to that derived from personal experience. Synthesis and communication of research is therefore essential to help prevent erroneous thinking and, where possible, experiential knowledge should be used in conjunction with other types of information to guide conservation actions. en
dc.format.extent 10 en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Environmental Conservation en
dc.title The nature and role of experiential knowledge for environmental conservation en
dc.type Text en
dc.type.publicationtype Article (Journal) en
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S037689290600275X
dc.contributor.institution Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences en
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair


Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics