Show simple item record Eden, Sally Bear, Christopher Walker, Gordon 2009-09-03T08:50:48Z 2009-09-03T08:50:48Z 2011-01-11
dc.identifier.citation Eden , S , Bear , C & Walker , G 2011 , ' Understanding and (dis)trusting food assurance schemes: Consumer confidence and the ‘knowledge fix’ ' Journal of Rural Studies , vol 24 , no. 1 , pp. 1-14 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.06.001 en
dc.identifier.issn 0743-0167
dc.identifier.other PURE: 120187
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: 8c97face-6278-453c-9eb8-3116897afb84
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/2903
dc.identifier.other DSpace_20121128.csv: row: 2380
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/6084
dc.identifier.other DSpace_20121128.csv: row: 3903
dc.identifier.other Scopus: 36348948447
dc.description Eden, Sally, Bear, Chris, Walker, Gordon, (2007) 'Understanding and (dis)trusting food assurance schemes: consumer confidence and the ‘knowledge fix’'. Journal of Rural Studies, 24 (1), pp. 1-14 Keywords: Consumers; Trust; Knowledge; Food assurance; Scepticism; Certification schemes Eden, S., Bear, C., Walker, G. (2008). Understanding and (dis)trusting food assurance schemes: Consumer confidence and the ‘knowledge fix’. Journal of Rural Studies, 24(1), 1-14. Sponsorship: ESRC en
dc.description.abstract This paper uses evidence from focus groups with consumers in England to consider how consumers understand and evaluate a range of proxies or intermediary organisations that offer assurance about food and consumer products, particularly voluntary certification schemes. This addresses the current concern in developed economies about providing information in order to reconnect consumers with food producers and to support moves towards more local, fairly traded and sustainable production. However, we show that such a ‘knowledge fix’ approach of providing information may not reconnect consumers so easily. Participants found it particularly difficult to work out what certification involved and what kinds of organisations were providing assurance. They built vernacular typologies and comparative judgements that did not necessarily identify or prioritise ‘independent’ third-party certification as the gold standard, not least because of the practical difficulties of monitoring complex supply chains, and expressed confusion and scepticism about how well food assurance schemes could work in practice. Our results therefore problematise the knowledge fix urged in the literature and emphasise instead the need to better understand how consumers make sense of assurance information in different contexts. en
dc.format.extent 14 en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Rural Studies en
dc.rights en
dc.subject Consumers en
dc.subject Trust en
dc.subject Knowledge en
dc.subject Food assurance en
dc.subject Scepticism en
dc.subject Certification schemes en
dc.title Understanding and (dis)trusting food assurance schemes: Consumer confidence and the ‘knowledge fix’ en
dc.type /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article en
dc.contributor.institution Department of Geography and Earth Sciences en
dc.contributor.institution Other IGES Research en
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en

Files in this item

Aside from theses and in the absence of a specific licence document on an item page, all works in Cadair are accessible under the CC BY-NC-ND Licence. AU theses and dissertations held on Cadair are made available for the purposes of private study and non-commercial research and brief extracts may be reproduced under fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review. If you have any queries in relation to the re-use of material on Cadair, contact

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair

Advanced Search