Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Williams, Howard
dc.contributor.advisor Erskine, Toni Narby, Petter 2008-01-08T16:14:03Z 2008-01-08T16:14:03Z 2006
dc.description.abstract This dissertation is a philosophical critique of R.B.J. Walker's and David Campbell's respective contributions to poststructuralist thought on ethics in international relations (IR). It focuses on how their work deals with the predominant question asked about ethics in IR in terms of its framing, the answers it calls for and the link between the two. This question (here the question of ethics) asks what ethical conduct in IR is and even though Walker and Campbell undermine the concepts the question relies on, they ask questions similar to this. The dissertation is motivated by a suspicion that doing so might be inherently difficult as well as by a perceived lack of similar engagements. The dissertation argues, through close readings of texts by Walker and Campbell, that their approach is different from that in normative IR in content, but similar in form. This form of answer is taken to depend on their framing of the question of ethics and to induce tensions in their answers. Due to the focus on these writers the knowledge claims will be restricted to their work and it will thus be argued that it seems inherently difficult for them to answer the question of ethics in coherence with the critique of normative IR that their work takes as point of departure. Hence, the question limits their critical potential and their persistence in asking it circumscribes the debate about ethics in IR. However, the dissertation refuses to go beyond the critique and search for a solution since this would contradict the suspicion that guides this work. en
dc.format.extent 507211 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher University of Wales Aberystwyth en
dc.title Poststructuralist Approaches to IR and the Question of Ethics: A reading of R.B.J. Walker and David Campbell en
dc.type Text en
dc.publisher.department International Politics en
dc.type.qualificationlevel taught masters en
dc.type.qualificationname MSc Econ en
dc.type.publicationtype thesis or dissertation

Files in this item

Aside from theses and in the absence of a specific licence document on an item page, all works in Cadair are accessible under the CC BY-NC-ND Licence. AU theses and dissertations held on Cadair are made available for the purposes of private study and non-commercial research and brief extracts may be reproduced under fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review. If you have any queries in relation to the re-use of material on Cadair, contact

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair

Advanced Search