Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Finlan, Alastair
dc.contributor.advisor Gunning, Jeroen
dc.contributor.advisor Ewan, Pauline
dc.contributor.author Trenell, Paul
dc.date.accessioned 2008-01-08T16:21:42Z
dc.date.available 2008-01-08T16:21:42Z
dc.date.issued 2006
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2160/410
dc.description.abstract For over a decade the academic community has been locked in a stalemate regarding the most appropriate manner in which to conceptualize the threats posed to human life by the natural environment. Initial strategies attempted to generate an extraordinary policy response by conceptualizing the environment as a security issue, giving rise to the notion of 'environmental security'. Objections were raised to this connection on the grounds that locating the environment on the security agenda could prove counterproductive by importing statist, militarist and status quo mindsets into the environmental realm. Recent moves from the critical security camp have attempted to negate these concerns by contesting that the nature of security is not fixed, and therefore may be modified to more effectively accommodate environmental hazards. Despite the scale of debate there is still no consensus on how best to frame environmental concerns. This thesis attempts to contribute to the breaking of this impasse. I contend that the project to connect the environment and security operates on the basis of the assumption that labelling the environment as a security issue will key in to the mobilization potential associated with the concept of security. Drawing on the work of the Copenhagen School I argue that the capacity of 'security' to mobilize is only unlocked as the result of complex political processes contingent on the presence of certain facilitating conditions which may not be fulfilled in the environmental sector. As such, successful securitization of the environment may not be a possibility. If connecting the environment to security will not mobilize an extraordinary response the entire rationale of the 'environmental security' enterprise is undercut, opening up the incentive to search for answers to environmental vulnerability which go beyond security. en
dc.format.extent 367992 bytes
dc.format.extent 148480 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.format.mimetype application/msword
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher University of Wales Aberystwyth en
dc.title The (Im)possibility of 'Environmental Security' en
dc.type Text en
dc.publisher.department International Politics en
dc.type.qualificationlevel taught masters en
dc.type.qualificationname MSc Econ en
dc.type.publicationtype thesis or dissertation


Files in this item

Aside from theses and in the absence of a specific licence document on an item page, all works in Cadair are accessible under the CC BY-NC-ND Licence. AU theses and dissertations held on Cadair are made available for the purposes of private study and non-commercial research and brief extracts may be reproduced under fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review. If you have any queries in relation to the re-use of material on Cadair, contact is@aber.ac.uk.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair


Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics