| dc.description.abstract |
This thesis attempts to establish three American comedians and
social critics as confidence men whose artistic manipulations allow them
to issue warning and criticism under the guise of humourous
entertainment. Without suggesting that all comedy is a game of
confidence, I try to show that the demands placed on these comic artists
by their society have necessitated that their responses, at least, must
be effected through deception; hence their designation as confidence men.
I first describe in the introduction the American society as a culture
which has historically favoured successful confidence men, artistic and
otherwise. I then place the comedian in the context of a confidence
game, showing that some of the earliest forms, of comedy have effected the
unification of pain and pleasure through deception and manipulations of
belief, paying special attention to the earliest comedian, the aboriginal
Trickster, as well as his descendants in classical theatre and mythology,
later European Lore, and American comedy up to the time of Mark Twain,
with particular reference to Melville. Then follow the individual
analyses of three American comedians: the first addresses the
manipulations of the alternately willing and unwilling confidence man,
Mark Twain, as evidenced in Huckleberry Finn, Pudd'nhead Wilson, and the
biography of Samuel Clemens; the second deals with the aborted career of
Lenny Bruce, who seemingly despaired outright of maintaining a comedic
game of confidence; and the third depicts Kurt Vonnegut as a comedian of
many deceptions, as revealed especially in Slaughterhouse-Five, Breakfast
of Champions, and Jailbird. The conclusion then briefly poses some
questions about the society that demands the success of confidence games,
and the artists who must perpetrate them. |
en |