Show simple item record Chandler, David M. Hubbard, Bryn 2011-02-14T12:39:09Z 2011-02-14T12:39:09Z 2008-08-01
dc.identifier.citation Chandler , D M & Hubbard , B 2008 , ' Quantifying sample bias in clast fabric measurements ' Sedimentology , vol 55 , no. 4 , pp. 925-938 . DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2007.00928.x en
dc.identifier.issn 1365-3091
dc.identifier.other PURE: 157621
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: 218a3811-2bc6-4f2b-bffd-bd4b731c8114
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/6107
dc.identifier.other DSpace_20121128.csv: row: 3936
dc.identifier.other RAD: 3553
dc.identifier.other RAD_Outputs_All_ID_Import_20121105.csv: row: 1565
dc.identifier.other Scopus: 47649103190
dc.description Chandler, D. M., Hubbard, B. (2008). Quantifying sample bias in clast fabric measurements. Sedimentology, 55(4): 925-938. en
dc.description.abstract Sampling elongate clasts that protrude from a planar face for clast macro-fabric analysis introduces a bias into reconstructed fabrics because clasts aligned perpendicular to the sampling face are over-represented relative to those aligned parallel to the face. This study develops a probability-based mathematical analysis to quantify sample bias for a variety of clast shapes and population fabrics, including isotropic, clustered and girdled fabric styles. Bias is expressed in terms of sample eigenvalues and eigenvectors relative to those of the parent population. Results indicate that sampling always has the effect of artificially drawing fabrics towards perpendicularity to the sampling face relative to the populations from which they are drawn. This rotation generally has the effect of artificially strengthening population fabrics, by up to 30% in the case of very weakly clustered or girdled populations. However, fabric strengthening is by no means universal and sampling alters different parent populations in different, sometimes complex, ways: the analysis in this paper identifies situations where sampling can strengthen or weaken parent fabrics, where it can rotate parent fabrics (by up to 90° in the case of a very weak population fabric), and where it can even change the style of a population fabric. For example, near-isotropic population fabrics can appear clustered; weakly clustered and weakly girdled population fabrics can appear isotropic; weakly clustered population fabrics can appear weakly girdled; and girdled population fabrics can appear clustered. Overall, this analysis indicates that weakly orientated population fabrics are most susceptible to bias. Thus, a weakly clustered population fabric aligned parallel to a sample face is particularly susceptible to major sample bias in both fabric strength (artificially overestimated) and orientation (artificially rotated perpendicular to the face). Bias can be reduced either by sampling all the clasts from a cube-shaped block of sediment excavated from the face, or by sampling equal numbers of clasts from the three orthogonal faces of the same sedimentary unit. en
dc.format.extent 14 en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Sedimentology en
dc.rights en
dc.title Quantifying sample bias in clast fabric measurements en
dc.type /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article en
dc.contributor.institution Centre for Glaciology en
dc.contributor.institution Department of Geography and Earth Sciences en
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair

Advanced Search