Show simple item record Vericat Querol, Damià Church, Michael Batalla, Ramon J. 2011-05-17T10:35:21Z 2011-05-17T10:35:21Z 2006-01-14
dc.identifier.citation Vericat Querol , D , Church , M & Batalla , R J 2006 , ' Bed load bias : Comparison of measurements obtained using two (76 and 152 mm) Helley-Smith samplers in a gravel bed river ' Water Resources Research , vol 42 , no. 1 . DOI: 10.1029/2005WR004025 en
dc.identifier.issn 1944-7973
dc.identifier.other PURE: 160567
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: 406f4064-5544-420a-aee3-add478e224ce
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/6762
dc.identifier.other DSpace_20121128.csv: row: 4057
dc.identifier.other Scopus: 33644807419
dc.description Vericat, D., Church, M., Batalla, R.J. (2006). Bed load bias: Comparison of measurements obtained using two (76 and 152 mm) Helley-Smith samplers in a gravel bed river. Water Resources Research, 42 en
dc.description.abstract We assess how the size of the Helley-Smith (HS) bed load sampler nozzle affects the accuracy of bed load sampling. Semitheoretical considerations show that the larger grains resident on the streambed can influence the sample either by blocking the sampler entrance or by causing the sampler to rest in a ‘‘perched’’ position. Probabilities for interference can be derived from the distribution of grain sizes but they do not capture the actual complexity of the influence of the bed on sampler performance. We therefore make an empirical comparison of sediment trapped by HS samplers with 76- and 152-mm intakes during floods in the gravel bed lower Ebro River. Most bed load rates appeared higher when sampled with the HS152. The largest clasts collected by the HS76 also tend to be smaller than those obtained with the HS152 at the same flow. Analyzing paired bed load samples, we find the probability of a bed load sample collected with the HS152 to be biased is around 43% in the conditions of the present study, whereas 65% of samples were biased when obtained with the HS76. The analysis emphasizes the influence of bed material texture over sampler performance and demonstrates that the use of samplers with intake size much larger than bed grain size (i.e., 5D) will increase the accuracy of bed load grain size distributions and the precision of annual load estimates in gravel bed rivers. en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Water Resources Research en
dc.rights en
dc.subject bed load transport en
dc.subject gravel bed river en
dc.subject Helley-Smith sampler en
dc.subject sampling bias en
dc.title Bed load bias : Comparison of measurements obtained using two (76 and 152 mm) Helley-Smith samplers in a gravel bed river en
dc.type /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article en
dc.description.version publishersversion en
dc.contributor.institution Centre for Catchment and Coastal Research en
dc.contributor.institution Department of Geography and Earth Sciences en
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en

Files in this item

Aside from theses and in the absence of a specific licence document on an item page, all works in Cadair are accessible under the CC BY-NC-ND Licence. AU theses and dissertations held on Cadair are made available for the purposes of private study and non-commercial research and brief extracts may be reproduced under fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review. If you have any queries in relation to the re-use of material on Cadair, contact

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair

Advanced Search