| dc.contributor.author |
Ahiauzu, Nkiruka |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2008-11-04T15:40:02Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2008-11-04T15:40:02Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2005 |
|
| dc.identifier.citation |
Ahiauzu , N 2005 , ' Multiple Principles and the Obligation to Obey the Law ' Deakin Law Review , vol 10 , no. 2 . |
en |
| dc.identifier.issn |
1321-3660 |
|
| dc.identifier.other |
PURE: 78162 |
|
| dc.identifier.other |
dspace: 2160/700 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2160/700 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://www.deakin.edu.au/buslaw/law/dlr/pdf_files/vol10_iss2/9.pdf |
en |
| dc.description |
Nkiruka, A., Multiple Principles and the Obligation to Obey the Law, Deakin Law Review. Vol. 10. No. 2. 2005. p. 524 RAE2008 |
en |
| dc.description.abstract |
George Klosko's multiple principle theory of political obligation is a re-cent formulation for the existence of a general obligation to obey the law. In the paper, I argue that the generality requirement of the obligation to obey the law gives rise to normative and factual problems of, respectively, motivation and comprehensiveness. I aim to show that whereas the multi-ple principle theory may solve the factual problem of the generality re-quirement, it does not solve its normative problem which I characterise as a first-personal implication of the question, 'why should I obey the law?' |
en |
| dc.language.iso |
eng |
|
| dc.relation.ispartof |
Deakin Law Review |
en |
| dc.title |
Multiple Principles and the Obligation to Obey the Law |
en |
| dc.type |
Text |
en |
| dc.type.publicationtype |
Article (Journal) |
en |
| dc.contributor.institution |
Department of Law & Criminology |
en |
| dc.contributor.institution |
Law and Criminology |
en |
| dc.description.status |
Peer reviewed |
en |