Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gibbs, Alun
dc.contributor.author Harding, Christopher
dc.date.accessioned 2008-11-04T16:28:23Z
dc.date.available 2008-11-04T16:28:23Z
dc.date.issued 2008-11-04
dc.identifier.citation Gibbs , A & Harding , C 2008 , ' Why Go to Court in Europe? An analysis of Cartel Appeals, 1995-2004 ' Harding , pp. 349-370 . en
dc.identifier.other PURE: 87306
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/725
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2160/725
dc.description Harding, Christopher; Gibbs, Alun, (2005) 'Why Go to Court in Europe? An Analysis of Cartel Appeals, 1995-2004', European Law Review 3, pp. 349-370. en
dc.description.abstract This study analyses the legal argument in and outcome of appeals against decisions of the European Commission in EC cartel cases over the last decade. It takes as its starting point the argument presented by Montag (1996) that defects in procedure or unsubstantiated findings of fact led to a high proportion of successful appeals in the 1980s and earlier 1990s, and so to a 'crisis in cartel infringement procedure'. The discussion here probes the quantitative and qualitative methodology of assessing the outcome of such appeals, with particular reference to cases dealt with since the middle of the 1990s. A reading of this sample suggests a low rate of success for cartel appellants, both in terms of legal argument and reversal of the Commission's decisions. This in turn prompts questions concerning the motivation behind such appeals, the deployment of resources in relation to this kind of procedure, and the role of the procedure itself in the European legal order. en
dc.format.extent 22 en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Harding en
dc.title Why Go to Court in Europe? An analysis of Cartel Appeals, 1995-2004 en
dc.type Text en
dc.type.publicationtype Article (Journal) en
dc.contributor.institution Department of Law & Criminology en
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en


Files in this item

Aside from theses and in the absence of a specific licence document on an item page, all works in Cadair are accessible under the CC BY-NC-ND Licence. AU theses and dissertations held on Cadair are made available for the purposes of private study and non-commercial research and brief extracts may be reproduced under fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review. If you have any queries in relation to the re-use of material on Cadair, contact is@aber.ac.uk.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair


Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics