Show simple item record Williams, John 2008-11-05T11:01:15Z 2008-11-05T11:01:15Z 2008-11-05
dc.identifier.citation Williams , J 2008 , ' Hunger Strikes: A Prisoner's right or a 'Wicked Folly'? ' ' , pp. 285-296 . en
dc.identifier.other PURE: 87663
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/745
dc.description Williams, John, 'Hunger Strikes: A Prisoner's right or a 'Wicked Folly'?', Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, (2002) 40(3) pp.285-296 en
dc.description.abstract The decision to allow the force-feeding of Ian Brady raises many complex ethical and legal issues. Early case law sanctioned force-feeding, as suicide was illegal. However, this raises the question of whether death by hunger-strike is suicide, or simply an exercise of the right to self- determination. Recent case law provides a mixed message. Some cases recognise the duty of the prison authorities to intervene, others that it is merely a power, whilst a third category emphasises self determination. American case law also fails to give clear guidance on the constitutionality of force-feeding. This article examines the case law, and considers the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the force-feeding of hunger-striking prisoners. en
dc.format.extent 12 en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof ' en
dc.title Hunger Strikes: A Prisoner's right or a 'Wicked Folly'? en
dc.type Text en
dc.type.publicationtype Article (Journal) en
dc.contributor.institution Department of Law & Criminology en
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair

Advanced Search