Show simple item record Kurki, Milja 2011-11-21T10:55:34Z 2011-11-21T10:55:34Z 2010-09
dc.identifier.citation Kurki , M 2010 , ' Democracy and Conceptual Contestability : Reconsidering Conceptions of Democracy in Democracy Promotion ' International Studies Review , vol 12 , no. 3 , pp. 362-386 . DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00943.x en
dc.identifier.issn 1521-9488
dc.identifier.other PURE: 173808
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: ef059c93-b1ec-4ae2-9335-c8714200b76f
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/7696
dc.identifier.other DSpace_20121128.csv: row: 4569
dc.identifier.other RAD: 364
dc.identifier.other RAD_Outputs_All_ID_Import_20121105.csv: row: 138
dc.identifier.other Scopus: 77956384881
dc.description Sponsorship: European Research Council, Political Economies of Democratisation, ERC grant number 202 596 en
dc.description.abstract Democracy is a deeply contested concept: historically, complex debates have revolved around the meaning of democracy and the plausibility of different ‘models of democracy.’ However, democracy’s conceptual contestability has received diminished attention in the post-Cold War democracy promotion debate as the attention of democracy promotion actors and scholars has turned to fine-tuning of policies through which a liberal democratic model can be successfully encouraged. It is argued here that the focus on the extension of the reach of the liberal demo- cratic mode of governance has resulted in a conceptually impoverished appreciation of the multiple meanings that the idea of democracy can take. It is argued that the ‘essential contestability’ of the idea of demo- cracy is not adequately recognized and tackled, which in turn has important effects for the ability of democracy promotion scholars, as well as practitioners, to take into account the consequences that consid- ering alternative (non- or extra-liberal) models of democracy might have for democracy promotion. To move the debate forward, I explore here, primarily in conceptual and theoretical terms, what serious engagement with the essential contestability of democracy might mean for democracy promotion. I argue that it entails a two-fold move: ‘plura- lization’ and ‘contextualization’ of the conceptions of democracy. The latter part of the article examines in detail the reasons that might exist for considering such a move in framing the study and the practice of democracy promotion, as well as the potential dangers that might be involved. en
dc.format.extent 25 en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof International Studies Review en
dc.rights en
dc.title Democracy and Conceptual Contestability : Reconsidering Conceptions of Democracy in Democracy Promotion en
dc.type /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article en
dc.contributor.institution Department of International Politics en
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en

Files in this item

Aside from theses and in the absence of a specific licence document on an item page, all works in Cadair are accessible under the CC BY-NC-ND Licence. AU theses and dissertations held on Cadair are made available for the purposes of private study and non-commercial research and brief extracts may be reproduced under fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review. If you have any queries in relation to the re-use of material on Cadair, contact

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair

Advanced Search