Show simple item record Milja en_US 2011-11-21T10:55:34Z 2011-11-21T10:55:34Z 2010-09 en_US
dc.identifier en_US
dc.identifier.citation Kurki , M 2010 , ' Democracy and Conceptual Contestability : Reconsidering Conceptions of Democracy in Democracy Promotion ' International Studies Review , vol 12 , no. 3 , pp. 362-386 . , 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00943.x en_US
dc.identifier.other PURE: 173808 en_US
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/7696 en_US
dc.description.abstract Democracy is a deeply contested concept: historically, complex debates have revolved around the meaning of democracy and the plausibility of different ‘models of democracy.’ However, democracy’s conceptual contestability has received diminished attention in the post-Cold War democracy promotion debate as the attention of democracy promotion actors and scholars has turned to fine-tuning of policies through which a liberal democratic model can be successfully encouraged. It is argued here that the focus on the extension of the reach of the liberal demo- cratic mode of governance has resulted in a conceptually impoverished appreciation of the multiple meanings that the idea of democracy can take. It is argued that the ‘essential contestability’ of the idea of demo- cracy is not adequately recognized and tackled, which in turn has important effects for the ability of democracy promotion scholars, as well as practitioners, to take into account the consequences that consid- ering alternative (non- or extra-liberal) models of democracy might have for democracy promotion. To move the debate forward, I explore here, primarily in conceptual and theoretical terms, what serious engagement with the essential contestability of democracy might mean for democracy promotion. I argue that it entails a two-fold move: ‘plura- lization’ and ‘contextualization’ of the conceptions of democracy. The latter part of the article examines in detail the reasons that might exist for considering such a move in framing the study and the practice of democracy promotion, as well as the potential dangers that might be involved. en_US
dc.format.extent 25 en_US
dc.relation.ispartof International Studies Review en_US
dc.title Democracy and Conceptual Contestability en_US
dc.contributor.pbl Department of International Politics en_US

Files in this item

Aside from theses and in the absence of a specific licence document on an item page, all works in Cadair are accessible under the CC BY-NC-ND Licence. AU theses and dissertations held on Cadair are made available for the purposes of private study and non-commercial research and brief extracts may be reproduced under fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review. If you have any queries in relation to the re-use of material on Cadair, contact

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair

Advanced Search