Show simple item record Yoko en_US P. en_US Eiji en_US Kogiku en_US Yasutaka en_US Noritaka en_US 2011-12-14T10:34:20Z 2011-12-14T10:34:20Z 2011-12-31 en_US
dc.identifier en_US
dc.identifier.citation Iwata , Y , Shaw , P , Fujiwara , E , Shiba , K , Kakiuchi , Y & Hirohashi , N 2011 , ' Why small males have big sperm: dimorphic squid sperm linked to alternative mating behaviours ' BMC Evolutionary Biology , vol 11 , no. 1 , pp. 236-244 . , 10.1186/1471-2148-11-236 en_US
dc.identifier.other PURE: 174693 en_US
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/7728 en_US
dc.description.abstract Background Sperm cells are the target of strong sexual selection that may drive changes in sperm structure and function to maximize fertilisation success. Sperm evolution is regarded to be one of the major consequences of sperm competition in polyandrous species, however it can also be driven by adaptation to the environmental conditions at the site of fertilization. Strong stabilizing selection limits intra-specific variation, and therefore polymorphism, among fertile sperm (eusperm). Here we analyzed reproductive morphology differences among males employing characteristic alternative mating behaviours, and so potentially different conditions of sperm competition and fertilization environment, in the squid Loligo bleekeri. Results Large consort males transfer smaller (average total length = 73 μm) sperm to a female's internal sperm storage location, inside the oviduct; whereas small sneaker males transfer larger (99 μm) sperm to an external location around the seminal receptacle near the mouth. No significant difference in swimming speed was observed between consort and sneaker sperm. Furthermore, sperm precedence in the seminal receptacle was not biased toward longer sperm, suggesting no evidence for large sperm being favoured in competition for space in the sperm storage organ among sneaker males. Conclusions Here we report the first case, in the squid Loligo bleekeri, where distinctly dimorphic eusperm are produced by different sized males that employ alternative mating behaviours. Our results found no evidence that the distinct sperm dimorphism was driven by between- and within-tactic sperm competition. We propose that presence of alternative fertilization environments with distinct characteristics (i.e. internal or external), whether or not in combination with the effects of sperm competition, can drive the disruptive evolution of sperm size. en_US
dc.format.extent 9 en_US
dc.relation.ispartof BMC Evolutionary Biology en_US
dc.title Why small males have big sperm: dimorphic squid sperm linked to alternative mating behaviours en_US
dc.contributor.pbl Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences en_US

Files in this item

Aside from theses and in the absence of a specific licence document on an item page, all works in Cadair are accessible under the CC BY-NC-ND Licence. AU theses and dissertations held on Cadair are made available for the purposes of private study and non-commercial research and brief extracts may be reproduced under fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review. If you have any queries in relation to the re-use of material on Cadair, contact

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair

Advanced Search