Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Iwata, Yoko
dc.contributor.author Shaw, P.
dc.contributor.author Fujiwara, Eiji
dc.contributor.author Shiba, Kogiku
dc.contributor.author Kakiuchi, Yasutaka
dc.contributor.author Hirohashi, Noritaka
dc.date.accessioned 2011-12-14T10:34:20Z
dc.date.available 2011-12-14T10:34:20Z
dc.date.issued 2011-12-31
dc.identifier.citation Iwata , Y , Shaw , P , Fujiwara , E , Shiba , K , Kakiuchi , Y & Hirohashi , N 2011 , ' Why small males have big sperm: dimorphic squid sperm linked to alternative mating behaviours ' BMC Evolutionary Biology , vol 11 , no. 1 , pp. 236-244 . , 10.1186/1471-2148-11-236 en
dc.identifier.issn 1471-2148
dc.identifier.other PURE: 174693
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/7728
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2160/7728
dc.identifier.uri http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/236 en
dc.description Iwata, Y., Shaw, P., Fujiwara, E., Shiba, K., Kakiuchi, Y., Hirohashi, N. (2011). Why small males have big sperm: dimorphic squid sperm linked to alternative mating behaviours. BMC Evolutionary Biology, BioMed Central, 11, (1), Paper 236. Open Access IMPF: 03.52 en
dc.description.abstract Background Sperm cells are the target of strong sexual selection that may drive changes in sperm structure and function to maximize fertilisation success. Sperm evolution is regarded to be one of the major consequences of sperm competition in polyandrous species, however it can also be driven by adaptation to the environmental conditions at the site of fertilization. Strong stabilizing selection limits intra-specific variation, and therefore polymorphism, among fertile sperm (eusperm). Here we analyzed reproductive morphology differences among males employing characteristic alternative mating behaviours, and so potentially different conditions of sperm competition and fertilization environment, in the squid Loligo bleekeri. Results Large consort males transfer smaller (average total length = 73 μm) sperm to a female's internal sperm storage location, inside the oviduct; whereas small sneaker males transfer larger (99 μm) sperm to an external location around the seminal receptacle near the mouth. No significant difference in swimming speed was observed between consort and sneaker sperm. Furthermore, sperm precedence in the seminal receptacle was not biased toward longer sperm, suggesting no evidence for large sperm being favoured in competition for space in the sperm storage organ among sneaker males. Conclusions Here we report the first case, in the squid Loligo bleekeri, where distinctly dimorphic eusperm are produced by different sized males that employ alternative mating behaviours. Our results found no evidence that the distinct sperm dimorphism was driven by between- and within-tactic sperm competition. We propose that presence of alternative fertilization environments with distinct characteristics (i.e. internal or external), whether or not in combination with the effects of sperm competition, can drive the disruptive evolution of sperm size. en
dc.format.extent 9 en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof BMC Evolutionary Biology en
dc.title Why small males have big sperm: dimorphic squid sperm linked to alternative mating behaviours en
dc.type Text en
dc.type.publicationtype Article (Journal) en
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-236
dc.contributor.institution Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences en
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair


Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics