Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jeff, Bridoux
dc.date.accessioned 2012-11-06T09:54:13Z
dc.date.available 2012-11-06T09:54:13Z
dc.date.issued 2012-11-06
dc.identifier.citation Jeff , B 2012 , ' 'It¿s the Political, Stupid¿: National versus Transnational Perspectives on Democratisation in Iraq ' Unknown Journal , pp. 552-571 . en
dc.identifier.other PURE: 185762
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/7899
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2160/7899
dc.description Bridoux, J. (2011). 'It¿s the Political, Stupid¿: National versus Transnational Perspectives on Democratisation in Iraq¿. The International Journal of Human Rights, 15 (4), pp. 552-571. Special Issue: American democracy, promotion and Obama en
dc.description.abstract William Robinson¿s work on democracy promotion focuses on polyarchy, or low-intensity democracy, a form of political regime that favours the Parsonian-Schumpeterian focus on electoral procedures between competing elites, as being the model promoted by the United States since the 1980s. Robinson argues that democracy promotion is an instrument working in favour of a capitalist transnational elite, organising the capitalist domination of popular masses and taming potential aspirations for enlarged democratisation of the social and economic life. This article focuses on the implications of such questioning of Robinson¿s understanding of democracy promotion and claims back democracy promotion from its Robinsonian instrumentalisation. In other words, the article argues that it is necessary to reconstruct democracy by putting some normative and political flesh back on its frame; a much needed conceptual enterprise that is critical to rejecting the contemporary mantra insisting on free-market economy and Parsonian-Schumpeterian procedural liberal democracy as the best package to spread democracy. Consequently, we claim that while there are clearly historical instances of democracy promotion used to achieve other means than genuine democratisation, i.e. democracy promotion as foreign policy instruments; there are also instances of democracy promotion being non-instrumentalised. Consequently, we argue that particular national problems of democracy promotion are relatively more important to consider than those generated by transnational processes identified by Robinson. The recent case of democratisation in Iraq provides the empirical background on which our conceptual argument relies. en
dc.format.extent 20 en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Unknown Journal en
dc.title 'It¿s the Political, Stupid¿: National versus Transnational Perspectives on Democratisation in Iraq en
dc.type Text en
dc.type.publicationtype Article (Journal) en
dc.contributor.institution Aberystwyth University en
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en


Files in this item

Aside from theses and in the absence of a specific licence document on an item page, all works in Cadair are accessible under the CC BY-NC-ND Licence. AU theses and dissertations held on Cadair are made available for the purposes of private study and non-commercial research and brief extracts may be reproduced under fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review. If you have any queries in relation to the re-use of material on Cadair, contact is@aber.ac.uk.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair


Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics