Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Griffiths, C. H.
dc.contributor.author De Battista, J. P.
dc.contributor.author Hill, N. S.
dc.contributor.author Hiatt, E. E.
dc.contributor.author Thorogood, Daniel
dc.contributor.author Klap, J.
dc.contributor.author Costa, M. C.
dc.contributor.author Reeves, J. H.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-02-05T14:13:36Z
dc.date.available 2010-02-05T14:13:36Z
dc.date.issued 2002
dc.identifier.citation Griffiths , C H , De Battista , J P , Hill , N S , Hiatt , E E , Thorogood , D , Klap , J , Costa , M C & Reeves , J H 2002 , ' Seed testing for endophytes by microscopic and immunoblot procedures ' Seed Science and Technology , pp. 347-355 . en
dc.identifier.other PURE: 134590
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: b7db988f-1c00-4469-8181-90843efa2eba
dc.identifier.other dspace: 2160/4039
dc.identifier.other DSpace_20121128.csv: row: 2981
dc.identifier.other Scopus: 0036332006
dc.identifier.other handle.net: 2160/4039
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2160/4039
dc.identifier.uri http://www.seedtest.org/en/home.html en
dc.description Hill, N. S., Hiatt, E. E., De Battista, J. P., Costa, M. C., Griffiths, C. H., Klap, J., Thorogood, D., Reeves, J. H. (2002). Seed testing for endophytes by microscopic and immunoblot procedures. Seed Science and Technology, 32, 347-355 en
dc.description.abstract The presence of alkaloid-producing endophytes in forage grasses are generally considered detrimental, but are beneficial to turf grasses. Endophyte technology is changing to where they are now viewed positively for forages as well. Therefore, endophyte testing is likely to occur more frequently in the future. To do so will require a less laborious method than current histological/microscopic techniques. The objective of this project was to compare an immunological test kit with the histological/microscopic procedure for endophyte (Neotyphodium coenophialum and N. lolii) detection among independent laboratories. Three tall fescue and perennial ryegrass seed lots testing low, medium and high for endophyte were sent in three blind replicates to laboratories in the United States, Netherlands, United Kingdom and Argentina. Commercial immuno-chemical test kits were sent to each laboratory, as well as the International Seed Testing Association/Association of Official Seed Analysts histochemical protocol for endophyte detection. All laboratories analyzed fifty seeds with both procedures. Within and between laboratory variability were compared and data from the two procedures regressed to determine specificity across the range of data. Endophyte values from one laboratory were outliers compared to values from the other three laboratories for both methods. Data from that lab was omitted from the test. Intra-laboratory variability ranged from 0.0 to 9.6 percentage units while inter-laboratory variability ranged from 0.0 to 7.7 percentage units. Intra- and inter-laboratory variability was similar for both endophyte detection methods. When microscopic and immunoblot data were regressed with each other the intercepts of the regression lines were not different from 0.0, slopes were not different from 1.0 and regression coefficients were 0.88 or higher. The immunoblot procedure is an acceptable alternative to microscopic analysis of tall fescue and perennial ryegrass seed for endophyte. en
dc.format.extent 9 en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Seed Science and Technology en
dc.rights en
dc.title Seed testing for endophytes by microscopic and immunoblot procedures en
dc.type /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article en
dc.contributor.institution Department of Lifelong Learning en
dc.contributor.institution Department of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences en
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Cadair


Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics